PT16

Message thread:

I've put all replies into one e-mail to save space. Could you try and do
the same please.

-------------------------------------

>> If it makes you happy I'll put your records on my site...
>
>I would not be so happy, but it's normal to put records in
>the section records...
>
>> Eventhaugh, i can't really beleive you can reach my
>>scores,
> >cause you ll always be to late with the mentality you've
>> got, like your nation which only win one time a cup...
>>
>> Ok, my petit French friend. You have to try and insult
>>me don't you, well
>> this doesn't matter to me one bit. You've got some
>>mentality there pal!
>
>Ah got nothing for your case.
>
>> >Do you want to know about my records?
>> >do you want to know how i manage to score easily?
>> >What do you want more.
>> >Your defensive, offensive and all of your records are
>>>weaks
>> >and all beaten by me.
>> >Half of your site's section have no sense to be...
>>>
>> erm... how can a defensive record of no goals conceeded
>>be weak?
>
>It's weak when someone (me) have done better because
>conceeded 0 goals in X matchs (X far better than 60).

Yes, so I only tried for one season, the next season I couldn't be bothered
to try it again.

>
>> Boom!
>
>Boom boom boom boomboomboomboomboomboom, Splash, the
>357ieme goal is in the cage, it's a new records you can
>admit. What proof do you want, you want to come in my home
>and see the records when i'll performed it, you have to
>trust people. When you say you do 0 goals in 60 matchs, i
>have to trust (for me it's easier cause i'have done
>better), you can use restarts And for me, it's the same
>thing i have prouve you a 99-0 cause it's possible but
>more, i cannot prouve it cause it's imossible to prouve...

Well. You see on my page there are all other records, and no highest score
record. This is because it is very difficult to put the scores like 250-0
and 357-0 from 3 minute matches onto my records page. You may be frustrated
if it seems like people don't believe you, but no offence is intended, you
should know that!

In a way it does seem that you may be honest, because otherwise why would
you argue so strongly. But 357-0 is incomprehensable, je ne comprende pas -
my French is poor.

------------------------------------

>> >When i shot i
>> >score! I usually got 22 shots for 20 goals, against
>>>someone
>> >link you (no offense) i cannot loose...
>>
>> It is different playing against humans rather than
>>computer - especially me.
>> Computer makes too many mistakes and gives too many
>>chances with no flair or
>> imagination!
>
>Perhaps but the goal keeper you could not control him so
>that when i will shot, you will conceeded a goal.

I usually defend most shots before they reach the keeper, I do not trust
him. Very often in a match, my opponent will not have any shots on goal.

>And why could't you score more goals if the computer makes
>so many mistakes (Pt's reply: cause i play a sexy football!)

Why couln't I score more goals, well simply because I don't have to. If I
had to then I would.

>> >The strongest teams
>> >played by the computer are all beaten by more than 20
>>>gaols
>> >in a three minutes match (i know more than 2 mins cos pc,
>> >but it's written 3...), for exemple, liverpool 23-0,
>>>Bayer
>> >21-0; arsenal 32-0...
>>
>> I accept that with practice on goals, this is possible.
>>
>> >And against weak teams, i raise my
>> >score at easily 40 or 50 goals when in a good form. For
>> >357, there is a special techique, so that i cannot
>>>reveal...
>>
>> So you say. I'd like to know that special technique, I
>>suspect it maybe
>> involves changing the other team's tactics?
>>
>
>Oh my god, how can you do that.

Well it was just a guess, not an accusation.

>> >Please, if you want to prouve me you are very strong,
>>>train
>> >a month with your strongest favorite team and try to be
>>>the
>> >more offensive as you can be.
>>
>> I think that I do not take Sensible Soccer as seriously
>>as you do. I play
>> to relax and have some fun, not concentrate too hard on
>>making so many big
>> scores. I do not take the game seriously enough now to
>>take a month for
>>practicing. I would rather be serious about real
>>football and spend a month
>> practiving that. If my page is more complete in the
>>future and I get time
>> to play more SWOS, then I might try to score as many as
>>you do. But... for
>> now... non.
>
>I play relaxing Paul, seriously, i play when relaxing...
>Can you send me your highlights and match of your 26-0, i
>want to see the century's match.

The highlights are from Amiga Sensi V1.1, they would not work with PC.

>> >Eventhaugh, i can't really beleive you can reach my
>>>scores,
>> >cause you ll always be to late with the mentality you've
> >>got, like your nation which only win one time a cup...
>>
>> You probably wouldn't believe that...
>
>I would beleive you as you beleive me, with proof and
>performance, you have no performance and so no proof at all.

Proof and performance. I really don't see why it is required for one to
prove oneself to anyone. If they are good players and enjoy playing SWOS,
then I cannot see why someone should argue that they are crap.

>> >I hope you'll progress and give me the proof of your real
>> >power...
>>
>> We'll see...
>>
>In how many month, thanx to me i'm here, or you would never
>progress.

I will progress in my own way, in my own time. You really cannot influence
the way I play.

If you want a proper honest answer from me about this - here it is;

I do not have time to play SWOS a lot. I am busy, and I have better things
to do that worry about my SWOS goals ratio. I'd rather have a better score
in real football. You can argue that I am all talk, but that doesn't matter
as I see no need to prove myself anyway, and I don't have the time to "prove
my power".

-------------------------------------------------------

> >Ps: i never use restarts.(trust me) Curious, with craps
>>you
> >score 4 goals against acmilan and with your best team
>>it's
> >not really better, how many restarts did you used???
>
>Reply tome Paul, i repeat Curious, with craps you
>score 4 goals against acmilan and with your best team it's
> not really better???

With my best team. and which team do you mean by that. I am sure you are
exagerating, because my best team's scores are much better than 4-0 per
patch. Like I said before, the last career which I played properly, my
goals average was over 10 per match, getting closer to 20.

>> For the Milan match, I only played 4 times before I got 4-
>>0! And in this
>> tournament you are allowed to restart.
>
>It's because it's completly nonsense

I don't think it's nonsense, I think it's fun.

>> >Too bad for you football isn't played by 5 years old
>> >children instead of athletles.
>
>Why did't you reply here!

I didn't really understand what you were trying to say here. btw, football
is played by 5 year-olds, as well as athletes.

>> >And the average of restarts when you wanna do a good
>>>champ,
>> >What's the number, I m so curious.
>>
>> I never restart in a career or diy! I never restarted in
>>Damian's
>> tournament.
>
>Perhaps in damien tournament, but as i told you, you say
>that when you want to do a good carrer or diy , you use
>restarts...

Er, no. i never have used restarts on my careers, even when I lose matches
with Hartlepool UTD. I don't play DIYs, I just play them when there is a
tournament.

>( To tell the exact truth, you say that when
>you doesn't matter you use no restarts so that, when it
>matters, you use it!!!!! I was very surprise to learn
>that...

you could say that. When it matters, I want to get the best score I can get
at the time, so If I get a poor score, I am not going to send it if I can
play the match again to get a better score. I did play 2 e-mail SWOS
leagues once, and I didn't restart any matches. I still won the league both
times.

>> >You use a lot of attackers, i think 4 or 5, how dare you
>> >say i use a lot of attackers. moreover, you're wrong, i
>> >only use 1, do some little maths if you cannot count
>> >yourself !
>>
>> I don't understand you here. Your Barcelona line-up was
>>this:
>>
>> Baia G
>>
>> Ceballos RW Radchenko LW Stoichkov A
>>
>> Ronaldo A
>>
>> Guardiola M
>> De Bilde A Enrique RB
>>
>> Donis LW Sergi LB
>> Giovanni A
>>
>> How dare I? I am wrong? I think I am right. Maybe you
>>should tell me your
>> best Barcelona line-up with all the best players then.
>
>You really doesn't understand a thing!

Well, you didn't make yourself clear before.

>I play with one attackers in attack!!!!
>The others are in defense or wing and never scored from
>this position, Stoich. and bilde have scored a few goals...
>The best line up would be every players to their post of
>course... Barjuan an enrique are players of barcelone, so
>that i play with them, that does'nt mean i would by them to
>be stronger ...

Fair enough... So Giovanni must be a major goal-hanger then?
.

>> >Try relaxing, you'll play swos better.
>>
>> G.. thanks for the tip, I hardly stress when I am playing
>>SWOS...
>
>i know...
?

>Perhaps, it's because i am speaking in english cause we
>can't understand each other...
>> -------Message d'origine-------
>> De : "Paul Turner" <paul@1turner1.freeserve.co.uk>
>> Date : 20/11/2000 13:24:18

Yes, perhaps that is true... a fair point

PREVIOUS / NEXT